5/3/05

Whitman's Good Samaritans

Here's a sample of the inane lost and found e-mails we suffer daily. I will include the student's name, and I'm still pondering on leaving his campus address so you can leave flaming sacks of cow shite (or hey, borrow some of ours) outside his door.

I've edited the following with parentheticals to better represent its asininity:

From: Nicholas J Denton-Brown

Lose an ipod? (trust me, it's safe in my hands. I wanted to make sure no other sketchy Whitman students might try to steal it, so I picked it up, probably right before you came running back looking for it). Let me know where you lost it (because, hey, I don't trust you) and what music is on it (enumerate to me your whole library, down to even the Andrew W.K. b-sides; because Britney Spears' "Toxic" isn't specific enough -- everyone has that gem), and it's yours again (but until then, I'm going to use it with wanton disregard, awesome!)

I see this type of e-mail every day. I was surprised not to read "I found an iPod, tell me the name and the e-mail address engraved permanently on the back and I'll send it back to you." The running protocol around campus is that each of us is trustworthy enough to take lost possessions into our security, but that our peers can't be trusted similarly. They, instead, must be run through all sorts of tests and secret fraternal grips and paternity tests before some cracked Frisbee or iodine-stained Nalgene can be returned.

I don't know how this specious return policy first evolved, or why each year's freshmen adopt it as quickly as any of our other ridiculous attitudes (read philosophies: "the best party is the one I haven't visited yet" or "cowboy costume = pink leopard print foam dome").

I apologize world, but here are your future philanthropists, a ruined batch of people who think their general benignity entrusts them with the care of other people's welfare. Here are your heads of Red Cross, those who sit on a Fort Knox of donations entrusted to them, but unwilling to put trust in the poor who need it. Each holding out the hope that, perhaps, the poor won't be able to navigate the bureaucratic labrynth to their money -- that the person who lost his iPod might just miss the e-mail you sent out.

6 comments:

  1. fine, great drew, excellent rant, problem is, what is the alternative?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Aaron, READ WHO POSTED JACKASS. That is all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is typical of you Aaron, an unfunny retort. Unless you're being serious, in which case, you're being a jerk.

    Why pass judgment on me, especially considering the diarrhea that typically spills out of your brain?

    I also get the feeling you didn't carefully read the post, b/c Drew and my styles are quite different stylistically.

    For stipulation: I'm being a jerk.

    ReplyDelete
  4. yeah, you're right, my retort wasn't that funny, in lieu of that I took a shit on Drew's computer, leaving a brown smelly surprise until I realized that Dan had posted, so I left a steamer on his machine too. 2 shits and two bad-blog machines: down!

    also i was being serious, there is no lost and found of any use so people should have to prove it is their shit, otherwise it's finder's keepers.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Aaron, I think you're missing the point. This system suggests the taker believes himself to be philanthropical, but all his fellow men, who he might reflect his kindness, phil-love, anthropos-man, are untrustworthy. I'm making fun of the opportunistic nature you've so brightly elucidated behind what looks like kindness towards your fellow Whittie. So I guess my question is why are you poking holes in observational humor?

    ReplyDelete
  6. cuz it beats poking holes in the apple pie with my cock

    ReplyDelete